KDlinks A400 vs Himedia Q10 Pro

In this article, we will see the comparison between two popular media players with comparable features: KDlinks A400 vs Himedia Q10 Pro. They both are running on Android platforms, and they both are capable of playing 4K Ultra HD content. So, which one is actually better?

Continue reading below to find out about:
– The design and connectivity of each model
– The features and capabilities of each model
– The performance of KDlinks A400 vs Himedia Q10 Pro
– Which Android media player that’s generally more recommended

KDlinks A400: Design and Connectivity
In terms of appearance, KDlinks A400 is pretty good. It comes in a sleek black body, and the housing is quite solid and rugged. Unfortunately, it is quite fat. This is partially because of the numerous connectivity options. If you are looking for a compact, space-friendly TV streamer, you may want to take a look at Roku Express vs Ultra.

The body of KDlinks A400 would be fairly good-looking if not for the sticker on the top panel. This sticker gives a cheap feel to the overall look. On the front, you can find a display screen which will show you things like the time read-out, along with a set of control buttons.

The layout of KDlinks A400 vs Himedia Q10 Pro is quite similar. This model features two USB 2.0 ports, one USB 3.0 port, and one SD card slot on the left panel. It has the HDD bay on the right panel, covered by a catch. On the rear, you can find the power port, Gigabit Ethernet port, USB 3.0 port, coaxial and digital audio outputs, HDMI port, and a video output with two stereo audio outs.

KDlinks A400: Features
KDlinks A400 claims to be the number one Android media player, and it is easy to see that this is not just a marketing gimmick. This device is equipped with powerful components. It runs on a quad-core CPU and a quad-core GPU with 2GB RAM. These main processing components should allow a very fast and smooth experience.

It uses Android 5.1 as the operating system. There are several pre-loaded apps including Google Play Store, Netflix, Skype, and YouTube. It can stream content over the local network. It supports Dolby DTS, Dolby TrueHD, DTS-HD MA, and 7.1 surround sound.

KDlinks A400: Performance
KDlinks A400 is not a perfect device, but the overall performance is very good. It can be a powerful movie server that doesn’t cost a lot of money. There are just several quirks and weaknesses.

This media player can play most 4K and Full HD content smoothly without a hitch. It even supports HDR content, which is great. The performance remains good when streaming from the Ethernet or USB 3.0. It supports the 3D ISO format, but it won’t play the 3D MVC format.

Unfortunately, the included KODI version is outdated. You will need to update it manually to get the latest version, and you may want to choose a different skin as the default one is not really nice. Then, strangely enough, the fast-forward and rewind buttons on the remote don’t control the movie. In order to fast-forward or rewind, you will need to use the on-screen controls.

Himedia Q10 Pro: Design and Connectivity
If we compare the looks of KDlinks A400 vs Himedia Q10 Pro, the difference is quite apparent. While KDlinks A400 is somewhat colorful due to the sticker on the top, Himedia Q10 Pro is notably more classy and elegant with a brushed metal casing.

Himedia Q10 Pro has a solid and durable housing. The front display is large and easy to read. There is a time read-out on the left and a set of touch-sensitive buttons on the right. You can turn off the display through the menu if you think that the light is disturbing.

On the left side of the unit, you can find two USB 2.0 ports and one USB 3.0 port, plus a full-size SD card slot. Meanwhile, on the rear side, you can find the Gigabit Ethernet port, an HDMI 2.0a port, a composite video output with a pair of stereo digital audio outputs, Toslink and coaxial audio outputs, and a USB 3.0 slave port. On the right side, there is a catch which covers the HDD bay.

The included is quite conventional. It does not have any distinctive feature, except for the somewhat heavy weight which helps to avoid a cheap impression. It has basic playback controls, directional buttons, numeric buttons, and a mouse cursor control. However, mouse control via the remote is terribly slow, so you should consider using a wireless mouse and keyboard for any activity that is beyond common media playback.

Himedia Q10 Pro: Features
Himedia Q10 Pro runs on the company’s highlighted Imprex 2.0 engine. It is a very good image processor. There is no detail about how it works, but the performance is akin to the Darbee image enhancer processor. So, it apparently uses a pixel-by-pixel image enhancement technique which is based on the brightness of each pixel and the surrounding pixels. Many people will enjoy the increased vibrancy and vividness. It can be turned off if you prefer the original content’s colors.

There are few pre-installed apps – which is a good thing, as most people prefer to avoid unnecessary bloatware. There is a leanback-friendly YouTube with a maximum resolution of 1080p Full HD, but you can install a third-party YouTube version to access the 4K Ultra HD setting.

Nevertheless, the user interface is not beautiful. It lacks a neat front-end where you can organize your apps and media. You will not get things like media descriptions or box arts. However, you can use the Himedia Wrapper App to launch the player from KODI, which will then act as the front-end user interface. This is an effective and convenient solution.

Himedia Q10 Pro: Performance
The performance of Himedia Q10 Pro is generally good. It works very well in playing various kinds of content, and is overall a stable device. However, it still has a few weaknesses.

Himedia Q10 Pro can work with content resolutions of 3840×2160 and 4096×2160 at frame rates of 24 fps, 25 fps, and 60 fps. It is one of the best future-proofed Android media players in this price range. It can play 4K content with a standard dynamic range without any issue. It is even able to play High Dynamic Range (HDR) content with impressive results, although this feature requires some complex set-up for the color space and bit depth.

It can play most Full HD videos smoothly. It can handle high-bitrate content over the USB 3.0 port and the Gigabit Ethernet port with similarly good results. It supports most 3D content, including 3D AVC/ISO frame-packed, 3D MVC side-by-side, and 3D MVC top-and-bottom. Strangely, it does not support 3D MVC frame-packed content.

KDlinks A400 vs Himedia Q10 Pro

- Newest TOP Quality High End Android 5.1 4K H.265 Quad Core CPU, 8 Core GPU, 2GB RAM, 16GB Built In Storage; HDMI 2.0 with 4K @60fps, H.265 4K Hardware Decoding, Support 10 Bit and HDR. Support: Google Play Store, SKYPE, Youtube, Netflix, and more. Current Best Hardware Media Player for Local File Playback Ability.
- 802.11AC, Dual-Band 2.4Ghz/5Ghz WIFI Support, with BlueTooth 4.0; & Super Fast GIGABIT 1000M LAN for the Best Local Network Streaming Performance, Data Transfer Rate is Around 20-30MB/s
- Come with DOLBY DTS Official License, Support DOLBY TureHD and DTS-HD MA, 7.1 Audio; Support DOLBY ATMOS and DTS+
- Adopting huawei Hi3798C V200 chipsets with quad core 64 bit Cortex A53 CPU and Quad Core Mali-720 GPU, Q10 Pro is capable of decoding and playing 4Kx2K@60fps ULTRAHD Videos, delivering 4 times resolutions as much as 1080p full HD
- With Android 5.1 OS, the Q10 Pro better support 64 bit CPU, and improve system reliability, memory allocations, power consumption as well as adopting material design UI with ART structure, ensure fast and smooth response.
- The Q10 Pro aluminum case ensures high- efficient heat dissipation. The internal SATA 3.5" HDD bay allows simple installation of HDD without extra docking. LED Display shows network time and the Smart Touch Key allows users to control the box without a remote

Conclusion
In general, Himedia Q10 Pro is more recommended. It has a more elegant design. It has better overall performance, and it supports more content formats. The remote is also better, as the fast-forward and rewind buttons are actually working as desired.

Leave a Comment